Most Read... John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Joshua WeinerAn Exchange with Daniel Tiffany/Fall 2020
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Sinead Morrissey 'The Lightbox' Philip Terry 'What is Poetry' Ned Denny 'Nine Poems after Verlaine' Sasha Dugdale 'On learning that Russian mothers buy their soldier sons lucky belts inscribed with Psalm 90 to wear into battle' Rod Mengham 'Cold War Hot Air'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This report is taken from PN Review 281, Volume 51 Number 3, January - February 2025.

Harmonium at 102
More Truly and More Strange
Harry Sanderson
When Wallace Stevens published Harmonium in 1923 it was strange for a few reasons. He was a relatively unknown New England insurance lawyer, he was releasing his first collection at the age of forty-four, and he was not easily associated with any school or movement. But above all the poems were simply very peculiar, mingling romantic and modernist tendencies in a manner that remains obscure at its centenary. Those who think the older Wallace Stevens spent too long writing in his own manner overlook the fact that he arrived late, not dressed in the appropriate fashion, with the feeling of someone who had been speaking to himself for years.

He also came reluctantly. In 1922 he wrote to Poetry magazine editor Harriet Monroe: ‘Gathering together the things for my book has been so depressing that I wonder at Poetry’s friendliness. All my earlier things seem like horrid cocoons from which later abortive insects have sprung. The book will amount to nothing, except that it may teach me something.’ He would later record the ‘horror’ that attended his reading of proofs. This is distinct from modesty, or the poet’s inevitable sense of inadequacy. The hesitance springs from the task Stevens had set himself, addressing a subject that could rarely be conveyed clearly.

That objective is something that can only be hedged at, often in terms Stevens himself employed: imagination, poetry, clarity. His syntax often suggests a philosophical argument, but the constituent disquisitions rarely amount to a plain statement. Take the closing lines of ‘Le Monocle de Mon Oncle’
Every ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image