Most Read... John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Joshua WeinerAn Exchange with Daniel Tiffany/Fall 2020
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 205, Volume 38 Number 5, May - June 2012.

Mark DowMerely Reading? MARJORIE PERLOFF, Unoriginal Genius: Poetry by Other Means in the New Century (Chicago).

Marjorie Perloff is concerned with how we read.

In a discussion of the intriguing work of Yoko Tawada, Perloff notes a significant transcription error in Internet versions of a Goethe poem (changing a pronoun's gender) and writes, 'so careless are our usual reading habits...'. This might seem overwrought - it was a typo - but it also seems warranted: Perloff's remarkably attentive readings shed light, linguistic and historical, on all sorts of texts. But at key moments in Unoriginal Genius she uses her forensic skills - and sometimes her own mistakes of transcription and omission - to distort what's in front of her.

In 'One-Way Street', Walter Benjamin writes: 'The power of a country road is different when one is walking along it from when one is flying over it by airplane. In the same way, the power of a text is different when it is read from when it is copied out... Only the copied text thus commands the soul of him who is occupied with it, whereas the mere reader never discovers the new aspects of his inner self that are opened by the text.' Intent on building her case for 'a new poetry, more conceptual than directly expressive', Perloff writes that Benjamin's comment is 'uncanny' in its anticipation of the new writing, 'now that the Internet has made copyists ... of us all'.

This is absurd. Benjamin is interested in the analogue experience of what he knew as 'copying'. That's ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image