Most Read... John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Joshua WeinerAn Exchange with Daniel Tiffany/Fall 2020
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This review is taken from PN Review 5, Volume 5 Number 1, October - December 1978.

Barry WoodAGAINST THE DAY Modern Scottish Poetry: an anthology of the Scottish Renaissance 1925-1975, ed. Maurice Lindsay, Carcanet, £3.90 (£2.50 pb).

This is the third version of Maurice Lindsay's anthology, but it is not altogether clear how this version improves on the first. It seems possible, in fact, that his editorial touch was surer in 1946 than it is now. One of the changes is that in this version Hugh MacDiarmid's poem 'The Little White Rose' (not, as it happens, a particularly good poem) is attributed to Sir Compton Mackenzie. It is interesting to know that the words are Mackenzie's, of course; but the point (which Mr Lindsay has since conceded in a press apology to Hugh MacDiarmid) is surely that no one noticed until MacDiarmid made them into something. One wonders why it was done, without even a footnote to acknowledge MacDiarmid. It's impossible to believe that it was simply a matter of giving credit where it was, supposedly, due. The point is worth dwelling on a little because it indicates something of Mr Lindsay's general attitude to MacDiarmid and the Scottish renaissance: an attitude which is, to say the least, ambivalent. For example, Mr Lindsay claims to want to represent the achievements of the Scottish renaissance, yet the last seventy-odd pages of the anthology contain only four short poems in Scots. Now I myself have some misgivings about what has been achieved in Scots by and after MacDiarmid, but it seems none the less strange that 'an anthology of the Scottish renaissance' (for which the revival of Scots, and an antagonism to English, were central) should so raise ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image