Most Read... John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Joshua WeinerAn Exchange with Daniel Tiffany/Fall 2020
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This report is taken from PN Review 48, Volume 12 Number 4, March - April 1986.

Theory Michael Edwards

'Look, if you can't write why don't you
learn to write criticism?'
'Do you think I should?'
'It would be fine', I told him. 'Then
you can always write. You won't ever
have to worry about it not coming nor
being mute and silent. People will read it
and respect it.'
Hemingway, A Moveable Feast


The English have always been strong on literary theory. I begin with this truism, since to many it must seem, on the contrary, provocatively false. The French after all, and the Germans, are theoretical, whereas the English know the value of attending to the particular instance. And yet from Sidney, through Dryden, Johnson, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, Arnold, Eliot, English writers have asked basic questions about writing, and, often in asides or in a few charged paragraphs, have found answers that still have power to engage us. Sidney's Apologie, the first major treatise in English, attempts to understand poetry at the deepest level, as a triumphant, 'golden', response to a corrupt world, and a means to knowledge and to moral and political action, and in its relation to philosophy and history. We are right to want to see as far as possible into what we are doing or studying - I presume? - by sounding its nature, by placing it in the contexts that mean most to us. One notices about such writing that it does not necessarily offer itself as theory, that ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image