Most Read... John McAuliffeBill Manhire in Conversation with John McAuliffe
(PN Review 259)
Patricia CraigVal Warner: A Reminiscence
(PN Review 259)
Eavan BolandA Lyric Voice at Bay
(PN Review 121)
Joshua WeinerAn Exchange with Daniel Tiffany/Fall 2020
(PN Review 259)
Vahni CapildeoOn Judging Prizes, & Reading More than Six Really Good Books
(PN Review 237)
Christopher MiddletonNotes on a Viking Prow
(PN Review 10)
Next Issue Kirsty Gunn re-arranges the world John McAuliffe reads Seamus Heaney's letters and translations Chris Price's 'Songs of Allegiance' David Herman on Aharon Appelfeld Victoria Moul on Christopher Childers compendious Greek and Latin Lyric Book Philip Terry again answers the question, 'What is Poetry'
Poems Articles Interviews Reports Reviews Contributors
Reader Survey
PN Review Substack

This report is taken from PN Review 155, Volume 30 Number 3, January - February 2004.

A Foggy Day Neil Powell

One afternoon last summer, temporarily fed up with the Wimbledon tennis I shouldn't have been watching anyway, I zapped over to a black-and-white film on Channel 4: dark London streets, fog-shrouded gaslamps, policemen in Wolseleys with clanging bells, crooks in sharp suits from tailors in alleys off the Charing Cross Road. 1953, I guessed, clueless as to the identity of the thing; and, when I checked in the paper, so it was. That, not the wretched drenched festivity of Coronation Day, is the London of my childhood, full of nuance and ambiguity in its soft-focus subfusc, though with an atmosphere which on a bad day would thicken into lethal smog. Give that London a nudge and it starts to turn into a book of its own accord: The End of the Affair, say, or Under the Net; Hemlock and After or A Glass of Blessings; or Muriel Spark's retrospective A Long Way from Kensington.

London in the 1950s was a city in disguise. Those too young or too distant to have any first-hand memory of it commonly envisage a drab, grey place of stultifying conformity. Others, better informed though less impartial, recall a time of sustained if often subterranean cultural and intellectual excitement, by comparison with which the 1960s were a garish, glitzy vacuum. It was certainly a different sort of city from the London of half a century later, but the differences are hedged around with paradox: much of the post-war capital remained shabby and damaged, ...


Searching, please wait... animated waiting image